Search Decisions

Decision Text

AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC 2012 05926
Original file (BC 2012 05926.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE
WASHINGTON DC


Office of the Assistant Secretary


AFBCMR BC-2012-05926

MEMORANDUM OF CONSIDERATION OF APPLICATION BEFORE THE AFBCMR

SUBJECT: 

	Having carefully reviewed this application, we agree with the recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt the rationale expressed as the basis for our decision that the applicant has been the victim of either an error or an injustice.  Therefore, we recommend that:

	The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air Force relating to the APPLICANT be corrected to show that she was promoted to the grade of major (O-4) with a date of rank of 8 January 2012, instead of 21 June 2012, and a promotion effective date of 10 August 2012, instead of 5 November 2012.

	Members of the Board considered this application on 1 October 2013.




			
			Panel Chair


Attachment:
Ltr, NGB/A1P, dtd 28 Jan 13





Similar Decisions

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2012 05926

    Original file (BC 2012 05926.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE WASHINGTON DC Office of the Assistant Secretary AFBCMR BC-2012-05926 MEMORANDUM OF CONSIDERATION OF APPLICATION BEFORE THE AFBCMR SUBJECT: Having carefully reviewed this application, we agree with the recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt the rationale expressed as the basis for our decision that the applicant has been the victim of either an error or an injustice. Therefore, we recommend that: The pertinent military records...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 05884

    Original file (BC 2013 05884.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2013-05884 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His date of separation (DOS) from active duty be adjusted to reflect the day before his Reserve appointment date in order to remove a break in service. STATEMENT OF FACTS: The applicant’s military personnel records indicate he was commissioned in the Regular Air Force, in the grade of second lieutenant (2nd Lt),...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 04325

    Original file (BC 2013 04325.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2013-04325 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: The Date of Rank (DOR), of his promotion to Major, O-4, be changed from 13 October 2012, to 2 March 2012. He subsequently met another promotion board on 13 October 2013. He was selected and processed for promotion on a later list and was promoted...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-00732

    Original file (BC-2012-00732.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application, extracted from the applicant's military records, are contained in the letter prepared by the appropriate office of the Air Force at Exhibit D. _______________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFLOA/JAJM recommends the Board deny the applicant’s request as untimely or on the merits. He also claims that the Numbered Air Force returned the Article 15 action because of the punishment's severity. ...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-03149

    Original file (BC-2012-03149.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-03149 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: 1. However, while his DD Form 214 correctly reflects his rank as “technical sergeant,” his pay grade is erroneously reflected as “E-5,” rather than “E-6.” On 23 August 2012, AFPC/DPSOR notified the applicant that his DD Form 214, would be corrected to...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-04604

    Original file (BC-2012-04604.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are described in the letter prepared by the Air Force office of primary (OPR) and is attached at Exhibit C. ________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: NGB/A1PO recommends granting the applicant’s request to change his Date of Appointment (DOA) in the Air National Guard from 7 May 10 to 30 Sep 09; however, if the BCMR approves, his Total Years Service Date (TYSD); Total Federal Commissioned...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-02209

    Original file (BC-2012-02209.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-02209 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO IN THE MATTER OF: ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: He receive a direct promotion to the grade of colonel/O-6. After careful review of this application, the most fair and practical remedy is to grant a special selection board by the P0610C Colonel CSB to allow the applicant the opportunity to write a...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-04609

    Original file (BC-2012-04609.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Her 16 November 2010, 14 February 2011, 5 January 2012, 3 April 2012, and 2 July 2012 Fitness Assessment (FA) scores be declared void and removed from the Air Force Fitness Management System (AFFMS). ________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSIM recommends approval of the applicant’s request to have her 16 November 2010, 14 February 2011, 5 January 2012, 3 April 2012, and 2 July 2012 Fitness Assessments removed from the Air Force Fitness...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 04057

    Original file (BC 2013 04057.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are described in the letters prepared by the Air Force offices of primary responsibilities (OPRs) which are included at Exhibits C, D, E and F. AIR FORCE EVALUATION: USAF/A3O-AIF recommends denial of the applicant’s request for the award of the Aeronautical Badge because she did not have at least 36 months of operational flying to be permanently awarded the Aircrew Member Badge. In accordance with Air Force Instruction 36-3203,...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-02831

    Original file (BC-2012-02831.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: According to a letter he received from the Secretary of the Air Force Personnel Council (SAFPC) dated 23 January 2012, he should have been discharged in the grade of Staff Sergeant instead of Senior Airman. On 23 August 2012, AFPC/DPSOE notified the applicant by letter (Exhibit D) that although SAFPC determined that he served satisfactorily in the grade of Staff Sergeant, it was for disability purposes...